Skip to content
Field VIII · The Memory · A Track for Life

History

From the Greeks to the summer of 1914, with Rome, its fall, the Middle Ages and the Renaissance at the heart. Twelve Books with named sources, exact passages, historians to read and essays to write, read like a historian. No calendar: a Book takes as long as it takes.

Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis.
— Cicero, De Oratore 2.36 · history, the witness of the ages, the light of truth, the life of memory, the teacher of life
ad fontes: back to the sources
Why This Track Exists

You found out in one lecture that history is not the story of what happened. It is the discipline of how we know what happened: who wrote this, when, for whom, and why. A chronicle is an argument. A biography is propaganda until proven otherwise. A king's genealogy tells you more about the man who wrote it than about the king.

That is a proof-checker's instinct, applied to the human past. So this track is built like the others: named sources, exact passages, historians who disagree, and essays due. It is modelled on a real first-year history module (Edge Hill's HIS1022, The Medieval World), and it keeps that module's habit of setting a primary source beside a modern historian every single time. It has no end date, because it is not for a semester. It is for life.

The Long Timeline · Twelve Books
Ic. 500 BC – AD 14The Craft & the Ancient Inheritance II509 BC – AD 180SPQR — The Republic & the Empire IIIAD 180 – 600The Fall of Rome — or Was It? IVc. 500 – 1000The Early Middle Ages Vc. 1000 – 1300The High Middle Ages VIc. 1300 – 1450The Autumn of the Middle Ages VIIc. 1340 – 1550The Italian Renaissance VIIIc. 1450 – 1600Print, the North & the New World IX1517 – 1650Reformation & the Divided Christendom X1543 – 1789The New Science & the Enlightenment XI1776 – 1848The Age of Revolutions XII1848 – summer 1914The Long Nineteenth Century
The Historian's Questions · Ask Them of Every Source
  1. Who wrote this, and what do we know about them? (Is the author even who we think? Remember "Nennius".)
  2. When was it written, and how far from the events it describes?
  3. For whom: a king, a monastery, a patron, posterity?
  4. Why: to praise, to blame, to legitimise, to console, to warn?
  5. What is missing, and whose voice is not in the room?
  6. What do historians say about it, and why do they say that, when they said it?
Continuous Practices · Every Book
✒

The Source Card

One index card per primary source, answering the six questions above. By the end, a card catalogue of the Western past.

⌛

The Long Timeline

One running timeline, kept by hand for life. Every person and event you meet goes on it. Chronology is the skeleton everything else hangs on.

⚖

The Historiography Ledger

For each Book: who argues what, when they wrote, and why they might think so. Historians are sources too.

⚲

The Pilgrimage

Each Book names a place to stand in. Walls, cathedrals, galleries and archives: the past is still lying around Britain.

On the citations: ancient and medieval texts are cited by book · chapter · section (e.g. Bede 2.13, Tacitus, Annals 1.1–10). These numbers are the same in every translation and edition, which is why historians use them instead of page numbers. Modern books are cited by chapter or part, since page numbers change between printings. Any university library search, or a free online translation, will take you straight to the passage.
"ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant" capitur urbs quae totum cepit orbem the sparrow through the hall Deus vult l'uomo universale sapere aude Calculemus!
The Twelve Books · Antiquity to the Summer of 1914
Ic. 500 BC – AD 14 · prologue

The Craft & the Ancient Inheritance

How historians think — and the Greek inheritance Rome was built on. Short on purpose: a doorway, not a room.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Herodotus, Histories — the proem + 1.1–5 — the first historian, and his sources
  • Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War 1.20–22 — method, not the war
  • Plato, Apology (complete) — Socrates on trial, 399 BC
Historians & Essays to Read
  • E. H. Carr, What Is History? (1961), ch. 1 "The Historian and His Facts" — the essay that started every history degree
  • Marc Bloch, The Historian's Craft, the chapters on historical observation and criticism — written by a medievalist in wartime, unfinished
  • Justin Lake, "Current Approaches to Medieval Historiography" — your Edge Hill week-1 reading; reread it now
Skills & Questions
  • Primary vs. secondary sources
  • The five questions: who, when, for whom, why — and what is missing
  • Fact vs. interpretation (Carr's fishmonger's slab)
  • Reading ancient citations: book · chapter · section
The Sessions
S 1
Carr, ch. 1 · Lake (reread)
Due: 300w — "What is a historical fact?" in your own words
S 2
Herodotus 1.1–5 · Thucydides 1.20–22
Due: source cards for both: what does each claim to know, and how?
S 3
Plato, Apology · Bloch, selected chapters
Due: Essay I — "Herodotus or Thucydides: who is the better model for a historian today?" 1,500w

PilgrimageThe British Museum, London — the Parthenon sculptures, and the argument over where they belong

Herodotus opens his book by admitting his sources disagree. Twenty-five centuries later, that is still the first honest sentence of any history.

II509 BC – AD 180

SPQR — The Republic & the Empire

The Senate and People of Rome: a republic that conquered the world, destroyed itself, and became an empire that pretended it hadn't.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Livy, History of Rome — Preface + 1.57–60 — Livy
  • Polybius, Histories 6.11–18 — the "mixed constitution": why Rome worked
  • Cicero, First Oration against Catiline (63 BC) — "Quo usque tandem…"
  • Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars: Julius Caesar and Augustus — gossip as history
  • Augustus, Res Gestae Divi Augusti (complete — about ten pages) — an emperor writes his own record
  • Tacitus, Annals 1.1–10 + Agricola 29–32 — Tacitus
  • Pliny the Younger, Letters 6.16 + 6.20 (Vesuvius) and 10.96–97 (the Christians) — Pliny
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome (2015) — ch. 1 "Cicero's Finest Hour", then onward through Augustus — your spine for this Book
  • Ronald Syme, The Roman Revolution (1939) — Preface + ch. 1 — Augustus read through the dictators of the 1930s
  • Edward Gibbon, Decline and Fall, ch. 3 — the Antonine golden age
  • Optional long read: Tom Holland, Rubicon — the fall of the Republic as a thriller
Skills & Questions
  • Republic vs. principate: how a monarchy wears republican clothes
  • Propaganda: the Res Gestae read like Nennius — what it leaves out
  • Tacitus's method: praise and blame of Augustus side by side (Annals 1.9–10)
  • Rome in Britain — and how Britain looked from Rome
The Sessions
S 1
Beard, ch. 1 · Livy, Preface + 1.57–60
Due: source card: what did the Lucretia story mean for readers under Augustus?
S 2
Polybius 6.11–18 · Cicero, First Catilinarian
Due: memorize the opening sentence of the Catilinarian in Latin
S 3
Suetonius, Julius Caesar · Beard, the Late Republic chapters
Due: timeline: 133–44 BC, the Republic's long collapse
S 4
Res Gestae · Suetonius, Augustus · Syme, Preface + ch. 1
Due: Essay II — "How reliable is the Res Gestae as a source for the reign of Augustus?" 1,800w
S 5
Tacitus, Annals 1.1–10 + Agricola 29–32 · Pliny's letters · Gibbon, ch. 3
Due: Essay III — "Was the Principate a restoration of the Republic or its end? Compare the verdicts of Augustus, Tacitus and Syme." 2,000w

PilgrimageChester (Roman Deva) — under an hour from Ormskirk: the walls and the amphitheatre. Later: Hadrian's Wall and Bath.

Augustus wrote his own history and had it cast in bronze. Tacitus wrote it again a century later. Rome is where you learn that the winners write history, and the losers' historians get the last word.

IIIAD 180 – 600

The Fall of Rome — or Was It?

The most argued-about ending in history: catastrophe, or slow transformation? The debate you'll carry into the Middle Ages.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Pliny, 10.96–97, revisited · Eusebius, Life of Constantine 1.28–31 — the vision at the Milvian Bridge
  • Ammianus Marcellinus, History 31.4 — the Goths cross the Danube, 376
  • Priscus of Panium, the embassy to Attila (the Greek merchant) — Priscus
  • Jerome, Letter 127.12 — "the city which had taken the whole world was itself taken" (410)
  • Augustine, City of God, Book 1, preface + chs. 1–7 — why Rome fell, as a theologian saw it
  • Gildas, On the Ruin of Britain, chs. 1–26 — Britain after the legions
  • Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy, Books 1–2 — the last Roman philosopher, in prison, c. 524
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Peter Brown, The World of Late Antiquity (1971) — complete, it's short and illustrated — the "transformation" school begins here
  • Bryan Ward-Perkins, The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization (2005), ch. 1 + the chapters on the loss of comfort — the pushback: it was a catastrophe
  • Guy Halsall, "The Barbarian Invasions", New Cambridge Medieval History I — your Edge Hill week-2 reading
  • Edward Gibbon, "General Observations on the Fall of the Roman Empire in the West" (end of ch. 38) — the 18th-century verdict
  • Peter Heather, The Fall of the Roman Empire (2005) — introduction — the barbarians put back at the centre
Skills & Questions
  • "Fall" vs. "transformation": two readings of the same evidence
  • Why historians date the end differently: 410, 476, 568… or never
  • Archaeology as a source: pottery, coins, roof tiles (Ward-Perkins)
  • Who counts as a "barbarian", and who decided
The Sessions
S 1
Brown, first half · Eusebius 1.28–31
Due: source card: a miracle told by a bishop-biographer — what can we use?
S 2
Ammianus 31.4 · Priscus · Halsall
Due: 300w — were the Goths invaders, refugees, or recruits?
S 3
Jerome, Ep. 127.12 · Augustine, City of God 1 · Brown, second half
Due: map: the Western Empire in 395 and in 500
S 4
Ward-Perkins, ch. 1 + comfort chapters · Gibbon, "General Observations" · Heather, introduction
Due: historiography ledger: Gibbon → Brown → Ward-Perkins → Heather
S 5
Gildas 1–26 · Boethius, Books 1–2
Due: Essay IV — "Did the Roman Empire in the West fall, or was it transformed? Answer using both late-Roman sources and modern historians." 2,000w

PilgrimageThe British Museum again — the Mildenhall and Hoxne hoards: treasure buried by Romano-Britons who never came back for it

Boethius wrote the most read book of the Middle Ages while waiting to be executed. The Roman world ended, and its last philosopher answered with a dialogue about Fortune.

IVc. 500 – 1000 · !!!!

The Early Middle Ages

Kingdoms from the ruins: monks, missionaries, Charlemagne, Alfred, Beowulf — and the Vikings on the horizon.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Gregory of Tours, History of the Franks 2.27–31 — Clovis, the vase of Soissons, and the conversion
  • The Rule of St Benedict — Prologue + chs. 4, 33, 48 — the operating system of medieval monasticism
  • Bede, Ecclesiastical History 1.15, 1.30, 2.13, 4.24 — Saxons, Gregory's letter, the sparrow, Cædmon
  • Einhard, Life of Charlemagne, chs. 22–27 — the emperor in private
  • Asser, Life of King Alfred, chs. 22–25, 74–76 — the king learning to read
  • Beowulf (Seamus Heaney trans.) — complete
  • Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 793 + Alcuin's letter to King Æthelred on Lindisfarne — the first Viking raid
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Chris Wickham, The Inheritance of Rome (2009), ch. 1 — the best modern overview; keep it open for Books IV–V
  • Henri Pirenne, Mohammed and Charlemagne (1937), conclusion — the famous thesis: Islam, not the barbarians, ended the ancient world
  • Huw Pryce, "Conversion to Christianity" · Tomás Mario Kalmar, "Asser's Imitatio of Einhard" — your Edge Hill readings
  • Caitlin Ellis, "Remembering the Vikings" — your Edge Hill week-5 reading
  • J. R. R. Tolkien, "Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics" (1936) — a lecture that changed how the poem is read
Skills & Questions
  • Hagiography and royal biography: genre shapes evidence
  • Imitation as a source problem (Asser copying Einhard)
  • Conversion: top-down, bottom-up, or negotiated?
  • Poetry as historical evidence (Beowulf's uncertain date)
The Sessions
S 1
Wickham, ch. 1 · Gregory of Tours 2.27–31
Due: source card: Clovis's conversion — told how, and why that way?
S 2
Rule of St Benedict · Bede 1.15, 1.30, 2.13, 4.24 · Pryce
Due: copy the sparrow passage into your commonplace book
S 3
Einhard 22–27 · Asser 22–25, 74–76 · Kalmar
Due: Essay V — "How accurately do Einhard and Asser depict their kings?" 2,000w (your Edge Hill question, done for love)
S 4
Beowulf · Tolkien, "The Monsters and the Critics"
Due: 500w — what can a poem tell a historian that a chronicle can't?
S 5
ASC 793 · Alcuin's letter · Ellis · Pirenne, conclusion
Due: Essay VI — "Pirenne argued that without Mohammed, Charlemagne would have been inconceivable. Assess." 1,800w

PilgrimageSutton Hoo helmet at the British Museum · Lindisfarne, where the raids began · the Book of Kells at Trinity College Dublin

Bede was writing history in a monastery on the edge of the known world, and he still stopped to record where his information came from. Footnotes are older than printing.

Vc. 1000 – 1300 · !!!!

The High Middle Ages

Conquest, crusade, cathedrals and universities — and the medieval logicians who are your intellectual ancestors.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 1065–67 + 1086 · the Bayeux Tapestry (the full panel sequence online) — 1066, two ways
  • Gregory VII, Dictatus Papae (1075) — the pope claims to judge kings
  • Fulcher of Chartres, Urban II's speech at Clermont (1095) · Anna Komnene, Alexiad, Book 10 — the Crusade from the West and from Byzantium
  • Usama ibn Munqidh, The Book of Contemplation — the passages on the Franks — a Syrian knight on the crusaders
  • Anselm, Proslogion 2–4 + Gaunilo's reply — the ontological argument: a proof you can test
  • Abelard, Historia Calamitatum + Heloise's first letter — the most famous love story of the medieval university
  • Aquinas, Summa Theologiae I, q.2, a.3 — the five ways, read as argument structure
  • Magna Carta (1215), clauses 39–40 · Marie de France, "Lanval" — law and romance
Historians & Essays to Read
  • R. W. Southern, The Making of the Middle Ages (1953) — a classic, and beautifully written
  • Charles Homer Haskins, The Renaissance of the Twelfth Century (1927), ch. 1 — a renaissance before the Renaissance
  • Elizabeth A. R. Brown, "The Tyranny of a Construct: Feudalism and Historians of Medieval Europe", American Historical Review 79 (1974) — essay: does "feudalism" even exist?
  • Jonathan Riley-Smith, "Crusading as an Act of Love", History 65 (1980) — essay: why people really went
  • Lynn White Jr., Medieval Technology and Social Change (1962), ch. 1 — the stirrup thesis: engineering as the engine of history (and why historians attacked it)
  • R. I. Moore, The Formation of a Persecuting Society (1987) — the darker side of the same centuries
  • Monika Otter, "1066" · Richard Abels, "'Feudalism' and the Medieval Historian" — your Edge Hill readings
Skills & Questions
  • The "watershed" question: was 1066 a turning point, or made one later?
  • One event, three perspectives: Latin, Greek and Arabic sources on the Crusades
  • Scholastic method: quaestio, objections, reply
  • Models vs. reality: "feudalism" as a historian's construct
The Sessions
S 1
ASC 1065–67, 1086 · Bayeux Tapestry · Otter
Due: Essay VII — "How far was the Norman Conquest a watershed in medieval sources, compared with modern historians?" 2,000w (the Edge Hill question)
S 2
Dictatus Papae · Southern, first half · Haskins, ch. 1
Due: timeline: 1050–1200, popes vs. emperors
S 3
Fulcher · Anna Komnene, Book 10 · Usama · Riley-Smith
Due: source cards ×3 — the same Franks, seen by three civilizations
S 4
Anselm 2–4 + Gaunilo · Abelard + Heloise · Aquinas I q.2 a.3
Due: formalize Anselm's argument in first-order logic, then say where Gaunilo hits it
S 5
Magna Carta 39–40 · "Lanval" · E. A. R. Brown · Abels · White, ch. 1 · Moore
Due: Essay VIII — "Is 'feudalism' a useful concept for historians?" 1,800w

PilgrimageDurham Cathedral · Canterbury · Salisbury Cathedral's 1215 Magna Carta · the Bodleian in Oxford

Anselm tried to prove God exists with pure reasoning; a monk called Gaunilo answered with a perfect island. The medieval university was a proof seminar that never adjourned, and you would have fitted right in.

VIc. 1300 – 1450 · !!!!

The Autumn of the Middle Ages

Plague, revolt, schism, Joan of Arc, Chaucer, and the first woman in Europe to live by her pen.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Boccaccio, Decameron — Introduction to Day 1 — the Black Death in Florence, 1348
  • Froissart, Chronicles — the Peasants' Revolt of 1381 and John Ball's sermon — "When Adam delved and Eve span…"
  • Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales — General Prologue — a portrait of a whole society
  • Christine de Pizan, The Book of the City of Ladies, Book 1 — 1405: a woman answers the misogynists
  • The trial of Joan of Arc (1431) — the sessions of 21 February to 3 March — her own words, recorded by her enemies
  • William of Ockham, Summa Logicae, Part 1, chs. 1–3 — the razor's owner, on terms and signs
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Johan Huizinga, The Autumn of the Middle Ages (1919), ch. 1 "The Passionate Intensity of Life" — the most beautiful book ever written about the period
  • Eileen Power, Medieval People (1924) — "The Peasant Bodo", "Madame Eglentyne", "The Ménagier's Wife" — history of ordinary lives, a century early
  • Barbara Tuchman, A Distant Mirror (1978), the Black Death chapter — narrative history at its best
  • C. N. L. Brooke, "Heresy and Religious Sentiment" — your Edge Hill week-11 reading
Skills & Questions
  • Social history: recovering people who didn't write
  • Trial records: power shapes the transcript
  • Mentalities: how an age felt, not just what it did (Huizinga)
  • Late-medieval logic as the bridge to modern logic
The Sessions
S 1
Boccaccio, Day 1 Introduction · Tuchman, Black Death chapter
Due: source card: a storyteller as eyewitness
S 2
Froissart on 1381 · Power, the three portraits
Due: 300w — how can we write the history of people who left no writing?
S 3
Chaucer, General Prologue · Christine, Book 1
Due: memorize the first 18 lines of the General Prologue in Middle English
S 4
Joan of Arc's trial · Huizinga, ch. 1 · Ockham, Summa Logicae 1.1–3
Due: Essay IX — "How useful is the record of Joan of Arc's trial as a source for Joan herself?" 1,800w

PilgrimageCanterbury — Chaucer's destination · York Minster · the Tower of London

Christine de Pizan was widowed at twenty-five and wrote to feed her children. She built a city of women out of argument. Some foundations are laid in prose.

VIIc. 1340 – 1550 · ★ favourite

The Italian Renaissance

Petrarch climbs a mountain, Valla catches a forgery, Brunelleschi raises a dome, and Machiavelli puts on his good clothes to talk with the ancients.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Petrarch, "The Ascent of Mont Ventoux" (Familiares 4.1) + his letter to Cicero (Fam. 24.3) — the man who invented the "Dark Ages"
  • Lorenzo Valla, On the Donation of Constantine (1440) — the forgery exposed
  • Leon Battista Alberti, On Painting, Book 1 — perspective as geometry
  • Pico della Mirandola, Oration on the Dignity of Man (1486) — the manifesto
  • Machiavelli, The Prince, chs. 15, 17, 18, 25 + the letter to Vettori (10 Dec 1513) — Machiavelli
  • Castiglione, The Book of the Courtier, Book 1 (esp. 1.26, sprezzatura) — the art of effortless grace
  • Vasari, Lives of the Artists: Brunelleschi, Leonardo, Michelangelo — the first art historian, and his favourites
  • Leonardo da Vinci, Notebooks (selections) — the engineer's Renaissance
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Jacob Burckhardt, The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy (1860), Part I "The State as a Work of Art" + Part II "The Development of the Individual" — the book that invented the Renaissance as we imagine it
  • Joan Kelly, "Did Women Have a Renaissance?" (1977) — essay: the answer is no, and it changed the field
  • Michael Baxandall, Painting and Experience in Fifteenth-Century Italy (1972), chs. 1–2 — contracts, money, and "the period eye"
  • Peter Burke, The Italian Renaissance: Culture and Society in Italy, introduction — the sociological view
  • Stephen Greenblatt, The Swerve (2011), then medievalists' responses to it, e.g. Jim Hinch in the LA Review of Books (2012) — a prizewinning book, read as a case study in teleology
Skills & Questions
  • Humanism: ad fontes, back to the sources
  • Philology as proof: Valla's method is textual forensics
  • Burckhardt's thesis and its critics: was the Renaissance a break?
  • Reading art as a historical source (Baxandall)
The Sessions
S 1
Petrarch, Fam. 4.1 + 24.3 · Burckhardt, Part I
Due: 300w — Petrarch called the centuries before him "darkness". What was he doing when he said it?
S 2
Valla, Donation · Alberti, Book 1
Due: source card for the Donation — then do what Valla did: list the anachronisms
S 3
Pico, Oration · Burckhardt, Part II · Kelly
Due: Essay X — "Did the Renaissance 'discover the individual'? Assess Burckhardt's thesis in the light of Joan Kelly." 2,000w
S 4
Machiavelli, Prince 15, 17, 18, 25 + letter to Vettori · Castiglione, Book 1
Due: copy the Vettori letter's key paragraph into your commonplace book
S 5
Vasari, the three lives · Leonardo, Notebooks · Baxandall, chs. 1–2
Due: timeline: Florence 1400–1530, the Medici to the siege
S 6
Burke, introduction · Greenblatt, The Swerve + the responses
Due: Essay XI — "'The Middle Ages' was a Renaissance invention. How far did Renaissance writers create the period they claimed to escape?" 2,000w

PilgrimageThe National Gallery, London · the Uffizi and Brunelleschi's dome, someday · the Prado in Madrid, for the Renaissance that went south

Every evening in exile, Machiavelli changed into his best clothes to read the ancients. Your Renaissance can start the same way: dress for the conversation.

VIIIc. 1450 – 1600 · ★

Print, the North & the New World

Gutenberg, Erasmus, Thomas More, Dürer — and 1492, when Europe met the Americas. The conquest of Mexico, told from three sides.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Erasmus, The Praise of Folly — a satire that shook the Church
  • Thomas More, Utopia, Book 1 — the critique of England before the dream
  • Columbus, Letter on the first voyage (1493) — first impressions, and first misreadings
  • Hernán Cortés, Second Letter (1520) — the description of Tenochtitlan — the conqueror reporting to his king
  • Bernal Díaz del Castillo, The True History of the Conquest of New Spain — the entry into Tenochtitlan (Nov 1519) — "like the enchantments in the book of Amadis"
  • Miguel León-Portilla, ed., The Broken Spears — the Nahua accounts of the conquest
  • Bartolomé de las Casas, A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies (1552) — the accusation
  • Montaigne, "Of Cannibals" (Essays 1.31) + "Of Coaches" (3.6) — who are the barbarians now?
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Elizabeth Eisenstein, The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe (1983), chs. 1–3 — print as an agent of change
  • Matthew Restall, Seven Myths of the Spanish Conquest (2003) — historiography at its sharpest: how the conquest story was built
  • J. H. Elliott, The Old World and the New, 1492–1650 (1970) — what America did to Europe's mind
  • Anthony Grafton, New Worlds, Ancient Texts (1992) — when the books and the world disagreed
Skills & Questions
  • Media history: what changes when texts become cheap
  • Contact sources: conquerors, colonized and critics
  • Myth-making in real time (Cortés writing for Charles V)
  • The essay as a form: Montaigne invents your future genre
The Sessions
S 1
Eisenstein, chs. 1–3 · Erasmus, Praise of Folly
Due: 300w — was print a revolution or an accelerant?
S 2
More, Utopia Book 1 · Columbus, 1493 letter · Elliott
Due: source card: Columbus — what did he see, and what did he expect to see?
S 3
Cortés, Second Letter · Bernal Díaz · The Broken Spears
Due: Essay XII — "The fall of Tenochtitlan in Spanish and Nahua sources: how can a historian use accounts written by the winners and the defeated?" 2,000w
S 4
Las Casas · Montaigne, "Of Cannibals" + "Of Coaches" · Restall
Due: write your own Montaigne-style essay, 1,000w, on something you saw this week

PilgrimageMadrid — the Museo de América and the Prado · the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, for the northern painters

When Bernal Díaz first saw Tenochtitlan, he could only compare it to a romance of chivalry. You can stand on the same ground, in the centre of Mexico City. History is also what lies under your own streets.

IX1517 – 1650

Reformation & the Divided Christendom

Luther, Calvin, the Catholic answer — and the microhistorians who found the ordinary people inside the upheaval.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Martin Luther, Ninety-Five Theses (1517) + The Freedom of a Christian (1520) — Luther
  • John Calvin, Institutes, Book 1, chs. 1–2 — knowledge of God and of ourselves
  • Ignatius of Loyola, Spiritual Exercises, first week (selections) — the Catholic Reformation from within
  • Canons and decrees of the Council of Trent, Session 4 (1546) — scripture and tradition
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Diarmaid MacCulloch, Reformation: Europe's House Divided (2003), introduction + Part I — the standard modern account
  • Eamon Duffy, The Stripping of the Altars (1992), introduction — essay-length provocation: English Catholicism was thriving, not dying
  • Carlo Ginzburg, The Cheese and the Worms (1976) — complete, it's short — a miller's cosmos from Inquisition records
  • Natalie Zemon Davis, The Return of Martin Guerre (1983) — complete — an impostor, a village, and what a historian may invent
  • Keith Thomas, Religion and the Decline of Magic (1971), ch. 1 — the world before science took over
Skills & Questions
  • Microhistory: a whole world from one person
  • Reading the Inquisition's records against the grain
  • Reformation from above vs. from below
  • When may a historian imagine? (the Davis debate)
The Sessions
S 1
Luther, both texts · MacCulloch, introduction + Part I
Due: timeline: 1517–1648, from Wittenberg to Westphalia
S 2
Calvin, Institutes 1.1–2 · Ignatius · Trent, Session 4 · Duffy, introduction
Due: 300w — did the Reformation start from below or above?
S 3
Ginzburg, The Cheese and the Worms · Thomas, ch. 1
Due: source card: Menocchio's testimony — whose words are these?
S 4
Davis, The Return of Martin Guerre
Due: Essay XIII — "What can microhistory tell us that grand narrative cannot? Discuss with reference to Ginzburg and Davis." 1,800w

PilgrimageCambridge — the colleges where English Reformers argued, and King's College Chapel

Menocchio the miller believed the world began like cheese curdling, and worms were the angels. The Inquisition killed him for it; Ginzburg gave him back his voice. That is what historians are for.

X1543 – 1789

The New Science & the Enlightenment

Galileo, Descartes, Newton, Leibniz's dream of a calculus of reason — then Kant's sapere aude. The century your own field was born.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Galileo, The Starry Messenger (1610) + Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina (1615) — the telescope, and the argument with scripture
  • Descartes, Discourse on the Method, Parts 1–2 (the four rules) — Descartes
  • Newton, Principia, Book 3, "Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy" — four rules, one page
  • Leibniz, on the universal characteristic (Calculemus!) — selections in Loemker, ed., Philosophical Papers and Letters — Leibniz
  • Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, §10 "Of Miracles" — a historian's theory of testimony
  • Kant, "An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?" (1784) — sapere aude
  • Voltaire, Candide · Diderot, the article "Encyclopédie" — satire and the project of total knowledge
  • Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), ch. 2 — Wollstonecraft
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Steven Shapin, The Scientific Revolution (1996), introduction — "There was no such thing as the Scientific Revolution, and this is a book about it."
  • Herbert Butterfield, The Whig Interpretation of History (1931), chs. 1–2 — the essay on teleology we talked about. Read it now.
  • Robert Darnton, The Great Cat Massacre (1984), ch. 2 (the title essay) — the joke you don't get is where the history is
  • Dava Sobel, Galileo's Daughter (1999) — the trial through a daughter's letters
Skills & Questions
  • History of science without teleology (Shapin vs. the heroic story)
  • Testimony and evidence: Hume on miracles is also about sources
  • Cultural history: reading the strange (Darnton)
  • Tracing your own discipline's roots: Leibniz → Boole → Frege
The Sessions
S 1
Galileo, both texts · Sobel, selections · Shapin, introduction
Due: source card: the Letter to Christina — who was Galileo really writing to?
S 2
Descartes, Parts 1–2 · Newton, "Rules" · Leibniz selections
Due: Essay XIV — "Was there a Scientific Revolution? Assess Shapin's claim." 1,800w
S 3
Butterfield, chs. 1–2 · Hume, §10
Due: rewrite one paragraph of any earlier essay to remove every trace of teleology
S 4
Kant · Candide · Diderot · Wollstonecraft, ch. 2 · Darnton, ch. 2
Due: 300w — whose enlightenment was it?

PilgrimageEdinburgh — the Scottish Enlightenment: Hume, Adam Smith, and the Old Town they walked · Newton's things in Cambridge

Leibniz imagined settling any dispute by saying: let us calculate. Two centuries later, Turing proved exactly where that dream ends. Your history and your logic meet here.

XI1776 – 1848

The Age of Revolutions

The French Revolution, the Industrial Revolution — and Ada Lovelace, in the same Britain you're living in, writing the first notes on a computer.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Sieyès, What Is the Third Estate? (1789), ch. 1 — "Everything. What has it been? Nothing."
  • Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789) + Olympe de Gouges, Declaration of the Rights of Woman (1791) — the pair
  • Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (selections) vs. Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, Part 1 — the great British debate
  • Robespierre, "On the Principles of Political Morality" (5 Feb 1794) — virtue and terror
  • Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, ch. 1 — the pin factory
  • Friedrich Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845), "The Great Towns" — Manchester, an hour from Ormskirk
  • Ada Lovelace, Notes on Menabrea's memoir (1843), esp. Note G — Lovelace
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Eric Hobsbawm, The Age of Revolution 1789–1848 (1962), chs. 2–3 — the "dual revolution": industrial and French
  • E. P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (1963), Preface — rescuing the poor "from the enormous condescension of posterity"
  • Lynn Hunt, Inventing Human Rights (2007), introduction + ch. 1 — how novels taught Europe empathy
  • Simon Schama, Citizens (1989), prologue — the Revolution as tragedy
Skills & Questions
  • Competing narratives of revolution: liberal, Marxist, revisionist
  • History from below (Thompson)
  • Economic sources and statistics
  • Your own field's history: Babbage, Lovelace and the machine
The Sessions
S 1
Sieyès · the two Declarations · Hobsbawm, ch. 3
Due: source card: de Gouges — who was she answering, and what happened to her?
S 2
Burke vs. Paine · Robespierre · Schama, prologue
Due: 300w — why did the Revolution turn to terror?
S 3
Smith, WN 1.1 · Engels, "The Great Towns" · Hobsbawm, ch. 2 · Thompson, Preface
Due: Essay XV — "Was the Industrial Revolution a revolution? Compare contemporary witnesses with modern historians." 2,000w
S 4
Lovelace, Notes (esp. G) · Hunt, introduction + ch. 1 · reread Turing (1950) §6, "Lady Lovelace's Objection"
Due: Essay XVI — "Lady Lovelace's Objection: a historical reading of an argument about machines, 1843–1950." 1,800w

PilgrimageThe Science and Industry Museum, Manchester (the world's oldest passenger railway station) · the Science Museum, London — Babbage's Difference Engine No. 2

Lovelace wrote that the Engine could only do what we know how to order it to do. Turing, a century later, answered her by name. Sometimes history is simply a conversation that took a hundred years.

XII1848 – summer 1914

The Long Nineteenth Century

Nations imagined, traditions invented, Darwin, Mill, the suffragettes, the great logicians — and a world of security that did not know it was ending.
▾
Primary Sources
  • Marx & Engels, The Communist Manifesto (1848), Part 1 — the most influential pamphlet of the century
  • J. S. Mill, On Liberty (1859), ch. 2 — the liberty of thought
  • Darwin, On the Origin of Species (1859), final chapter — "endless forms most beautiful"
  • Ernest Renan, "What Is a Nation?" (1882) — a nation as a daily plebiscite, and a shared forgetting
  • Boole, The Laws of Thought (1854), ch. 1 · Frege, Begriffsschrift (1879), preface — logic becomes mathematics
  • Emmeline Pankhurst, "Freedom or Death" (Hartford, 1913) — the suffragette case
  • Hilbert, "Mathematical Problems" (Paris, 1900), the opening — "Who of us would not be glad to lift the veil…"
Historians & Essays to Read
  • Eric Hobsbawm, The Age of Capital (1975) and The Age of Empire (1987), the opening chapters — the trilogy closes
  • Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities (1983), ch. 1 — the nation as imagined community
  • Hobsbawm & Ranger, eds., The Invention of Tradition (1983) — Hobsbawm's introduction + Hugh Trevor-Roper's essay on the Highland tradition of Scotland — kilts, tartans and the Victorians
  • Stefan Zweig, The World of Yesterday (1942), ch. 1 "The World of Security" — the last page of the track
Skills & Questions
  • Nationalism as a historical construction
  • Invented tradition: spotting the recent behind the "ancient"
  • Ideas as events: Darwin, Mill, Marx
  • A deliberate teleology test: Boole → Frege → Hilbert → you
The Sessions
S 1
Manifesto, Part 1 · Mill, ch. 2 · Hobsbawm, Age of Capital, ch. 1
Due: 300w — 1848: why did so many revolutions happen at once, and why did they fail?
S 2
Darwin, final chapter · Renan · Anderson, ch. 1
Due: source card: Renan — what does a nation have to forget?
S 3
The Invention of Tradition, the two essays · Pankhurst
Due: Essay XVII — "How far were the nations of 19th-century Europe 'imagined' or 'invented'? Discuss with one case study." 2,000w
S 4
Boole, ch. 1 · Frege, preface · Hilbert 1900 · Zweig, ch. 1
Due: Capstone — "The Long Memory": 4,000w on a thread you followed across all twelve Books

PilgrimageThe Lake District — the 19th century's own idea of nature, and the poem you owe Wordsworth · Vienna — Zweig's city, the world of yesterday

Zweig called the years before 1914 "the golden age of security". The track ends here, on the last calm summer. The door to what comes next stays closed until you decide to open it.

Artifact Targets · What Exists at the End
17Seminar Essays1,500–2,000 words each, all built on sources plus historiography.
1Capstone"The Long Memory": 4,000 words on one thread across twelve Books.
60+Source CardsEvery primary source, interrogated.
12Historiography LedgersOne per Book: the arguments about the arguments.
1The Long TimelineBy hand, from Herodotus to 1914, and never finished.
12PilgrimagesFrom Chester's walls to the Lake District.
Where This Fits

History is where your two selves meet. Valla catching a forgery by its Latin is proof by contradiction. Anselm and Aquinas are logic you can formalize. Leibniz's Calculemus! leads to Boole, Frege, Hilbert and then Turing, who answered Ada Lovelace by name. And Butterfield's warning against teleology is the discipline you'll need when you write the history of your own field, or when someone someday writes yours. Read the past for what it was, not for what it became. That is the whole craft.